Search The Site

Equity Share Arrangements Getting Some Press

publication date: Mar 15, 2011
 | 
author/source: Chris Prang
Download Print Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
I have mentioned numerous times about Equity Share Arrangements/Agreements as a viable and more biblical way to obtain ownership of a home. Now others are starting to catch on.

See previous articles here, here, here, here and here.

An Equity Share Arrangement is simply having joint ownership in a property. Not joint ownership like a husband and wife would have, but joint ownership from two distinct parties.

As I have stated many times, followers of Christ must start ridding themselves of their partnerships with corrupt, pagan and unrighteous banks, lenders and mortgage companies. "What fellowship does Christ have with Belial?" When it comes to owning a home, there are two realisitc solutions:
  1. Pay cash for your home and land...that is the best way to do it, even if it takes you years to save up for it.
  2. Do and Equity Share Arrangement with another genuine Christian who either currently owns the home you want to buy or who will partner with you in ownership.
With an Equity Share Arrangement each party contributes are certain percentage of the cost of the home. You may put down 20% and the other person may put down the other 80%. That means, you own 20% of the value of the home and the other person owns 80%. Then you start paying the other person "rental" fee every month with either a set amount going towards their 80% and/or adding additional principle when possible. As time goes on, your ownership percentage increases and their decreases. And at any time the two parties can agree to sell and split the proceeds based on their share of ownership. Either party could even agree to sell their portion of ownership at any time.

Equity Share Agreements are popular among resort home owners. These frequently have 6-12 different owners and each owner can sell their share at any time.

Next time you consider buying a home, give serious consideration to this option if you can't pay cash.

The article is below. To read in the NY Times, you have to Google "Alex Perriello Home Team" and it should be the top link. If I provide the link, it will ask you to login. Googling an article is a way around registering or having to pay the NY Times to read the article.

Home Team

THREE years after the mortgage crisis began, there are still 11 million to 15 million homeowners who owe more than their home is worth, meaning that about 25 percent of all mortgage holders are underwater. As a result, foreclosures continue to mount; many homeowners can’t make their payments and are tempted to simply walk away from their debt. Meanwhile, the lenders and investors who own the loans are unwilling to work out a deal if, as is usually the case, it means losing money.

Fortunately, there is a solution. Rather than be at odds, homeowners and investors should partner in long-term equity-sharing arrangements.

Here’s how it would work. Let’s say a homeowner purchased a house in 2004 for $300,000 with no money down, and the property is now worth $150,000 — a 50 percent drop in value.

In an equity-sharing arrangement, the lender would write a new loan for $150,000, retire the original $300,000 loan and, to make up for that loss, take a 50 percent deeded ownership interest in the property. The homeowner would also agree to split 50 percent of the net proceeds of any future sale of the property with the lender. The new arrangement would also include a buyout provision, so that if the homeowner ever wanted to take over the lender’s share, he would simply pay the lender a predetermined amount of cash.

Such a plan would be relatively easy to put in place, assuming the lender held the loan in its own portfolio. In most cases, however, lenders immediately sold their loans to investors and merely performed loan-servicing duties like collecting monthly payments and sending statements.

In those instances, the lender would have already made its money when the loan was originated, the proceeds from the new loan and the 50 percent deeded interest in the property would go to the investor, not the lender. The investor would also benefit from any future sale or when the homeowner exercised the buyout provision.

Equity-sharing would be a boon for everyone involved. Homeowners could stay in their houses and preserve their credit (assuming they stay current on the new loan). The neighborhood would avoid a foreclosure, which can depress property values. And the lender or investor could participate in the upside potential when the house eventually sells. Best of all, it wouldn’t cost taxpayers a dime.

A major reason the mortgage mess has gone on so long is that homeowners, lenders and investors assume their interests are at odds. An equity-sharing arrangement would bring all three onto the same side — and help solve America’s foreclosure crisis.

Alex Perriello is the president and chief executive of a real estate franchise organization.



Bookmark and Share

Christian Economics, Christian Finances, Christian Money, Christian Wealth, Christian Mortgage, Christian Mortgage Advice, Christian Mortgage Counsel, Christian Mortgage Consulting, Christian Investing, Biblical Economics, Biblical Finances, Biblical Money, Biblical Wealth, Biblical Mortgage, Biblical Mortgage Advice, Biblical Mortgage Counsel, Biblical Mortgage Consulting, Biblical Investing, Creating Wealth, Mortgages For Christians
Take The Survey
Upcoming Events
«  »
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
The Mortgage Truth
Kill Your Mortgage
Buy Gold & Silver
Christian Economics 301
Recommended Books
Samaritan Ministries
Franklin Springs
Vision Forum
American Vision
American Vision